Facebook Photo Sharing More Popular With Women

Women who base their self worth on their appearance share more photos on Facebook and have a larger network of friends, according to new research from the University of Buffalo.

Michael A. Stefanone, PhD, says the results suggest women identify more strongly with their image and appearance, and use Facebook as a way to compete for attention.



“The results suggest persistent differences in the behavior of men and women that result from a cultural focus on female image and appearance,” said Stefanone.

In the study, 311 participants with an average age of 23.3 years — 49.8 percent of whom were female — completed a questionnaire measuring their contingencies of self worth. They were also asked about their typical behaviors on Facebook.

“Those whose self esteem is based on public-based contingencies (defined here as others’ approval, physical appearance and outdoing others in competition) were more involved in online photo sharing, and those whose self-worth is most contingent on appearance have a higher intensity of online photo sharing,” said Stefanone.

The purpose of the study was to investigate variables that explain specific online behavior on social network sites. Among other things, the team looked at the amount of time subjects spent managing profiles, the number of photos they shared, the size of their online networks and how promiscuous they were in terms of “friending” behavior.

“Although it’s stereotypical and might have been predicted,” he says, “it is disappointing to me that in the year 2011 so many young women continue to assert their self worth via their physical appearance — in this case, by posting photos of themselves on Facebook as a form of advertisement.”

“Perhaps this reflects the distorted value pegged to women’s looks throughout the popular culture and in reality programming from ‘The Bachelor’ to ‘Keeping Up with the Kardashians.’”

The study, “Contingencies of Self-Worth and Social-Networking-Site Behavior,”is published in the journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking.

Read More

Social Media - The Black Horse

People say social media is unicorn, but it’s really just a big powerful black horse.
Sure, social media empowers customers like nothing before it. And of course, social media creates a new level of real-time accountability for companies previously accustomed to asynchronous communication. These are the ways social media is different. But in other ways, it’s largely the same.
Let’s compare email marketing and social media.

Market Size
When people ask you how big the social media business opportunity is, tell them it’s about the same as the email business opportunity. Very big. But nowhere near search, or television, or radio.

Messaging Flow
Email is somewhat an option. The only people that get emails from your company are people that asked to receive them.
Social media is also an option. The only people that see your tweets, status updates, foursquare check-ins, and notifications of your new YouTube musings purposefully signed up for the privilege.

Audience Count
The people that have option to receive our email are called subscribers. They can unsubscribe and remove themselves from the group.
The people that have option to receive our social messages are called followers. Or fans. They can unfollow or unlike to remove themselves from the group.

Viewers
In the world of email, we count the number of people that saw or read each message. That metric is called “open rate”, email marketers call this the “render rate”.
In social media, we wish we could count the number of people that actually saw a specific tweet. But we have that metric in Facebook, where it’s called “impressions”, and on YouTube, where it’s called “views”.

Actions
Email marketers closely track the number of people that click links placed in messages. This is reported as the click-through rate – which is expressed as a percentage.
Social marketers also very closely track the number of clicks, but that data is usually reported as an integer (often through bit.ly) because we don’t know the number of views, and thus cannot determine the percentage. Facebook, however, does provide this data, and calls it “Feedback” (percentage of people seeing a specific status update that click “like” or write a comment).

Read More